Francis and his "study" sessions got me thinking about something. Before you say "oh oh"....lemme explain.
I'm curious to know what people think and why they come to those conclusions.
Considering our animals are captive bred and raised, do we interpret their actions (for the most part) as being instinctual or not? If they are interpreted to be instinct, can they reasonably fathom what they need and what they don't? (not implying they won't accept what is forced upon them) If their actions are not based on their prime instinct to live and survive, do we consider this a natural captive based "learned" behaviorism? Will a dragon knowingly cause it's self harm or is it too "dumb" (for lack of a better word) to know better?
I'm curious to know what people think and why they come to those conclusions.
Considering our animals are captive bred and raised, do we interpret their actions (for the most part) as being instinctual or not? If they are interpreted to be instinct, can they reasonably fathom what they need and what they don't? (not implying they won't accept what is forced upon them) If their actions are not based on their prime instinct to live and survive, do we consider this a natural captive based "learned" behaviorism? Will a dragon knowingly cause it's self harm or is it too "dumb" (for lack of a better word) to know better?