Hi all, as title says I'm wondering if I should get a second opinion on my poorly dragon (age ~6) as I'm not really sure if the vet's advice lines up. Sorry for long post.
Background: a few weeks ago, I noticed she was suddenly stumbling/wobbling, struggling to move in a straight line, and sort of thrashing her head about while trying to get at bugs. Kind of distressing to watch, but otherwise she was normal; eating well (despite the struggle), drinking, not lethargic, responsive. I took her to the vet and after the usual run of questions they suggested it could be a sign of MBD, gave me some meds (Baytril and Emeraid @ 30ml/day) with a follow up appointment in a week. Took her back, and she'd improved but not fully recovered, so they gave me some more and told me to expect a return to normal within another week and to call back only if something goes wrong.
Well yesterday she suddenly started wobbling again so I brought her back to the vet today concerned that treatment clearly isn't working, and after a quick review (including of a video I took of the worst of it) we had a pretty weird-feeling conversation in which they surmised that she's actually doing a lot better now and sort of guessed that her movement might be neurological, the result of a stroke, and maybe permanent. The topic of quality of life and the Decision were brought up which was kind of out of the blue (as again she's otherwise perfectly fine), I was given a further course of Baytril and Emeraid, semi-advised on how to proceed and sort of sent packing a bit.
I have a few specific concerns but most critically I'm just wondering if anything they told me today sounds reasonable. A stroke and permanent neurological damage definitely weren't on my radar for possible ailments, and being left with a vague notion that her movement might not recover is kind of unexpected given that until today I had the impression it would/could. After questioning I gather that from here, in judging her health I should effectively not factor the movement. I'm also not quite sure what they based their "she's doing better" judgement on - it might entirely be on that she's gained some weight over the course of Emeraid (560 -> 620 grams).
I think what's worrying me is that it's a lot of unexpected information which maybe feels a little like guesswork. Coming away with not much in the way of certainty and yet another course of the same meds just feels a little...odd?
So yeah, bit of an odd situation. Does it seem reasonable, or is it worthwhile at this stage to question what I've been told and get a second opinion? My reaction might just be my own discomfort with what is at the end of the day bad news, but something definitely feels wrong-ish with where I (and my dragon of course) have been left.
Would much appreciate any perspectives on any of the above.
Background: a few weeks ago, I noticed she was suddenly stumbling/wobbling, struggling to move in a straight line, and sort of thrashing her head about while trying to get at bugs. Kind of distressing to watch, but otherwise she was normal; eating well (despite the struggle), drinking, not lethargic, responsive. I took her to the vet and after the usual run of questions they suggested it could be a sign of MBD, gave me some meds (Baytril and Emeraid @ 30ml/day) with a follow up appointment in a week. Took her back, and she'd improved but not fully recovered, so they gave me some more and told me to expect a return to normal within another week and to call back only if something goes wrong.
Well yesterday she suddenly started wobbling again so I brought her back to the vet today concerned that treatment clearly isn't working, and after a quick review (including of a video I took of the worst of it) we had a pretty weird-feeling conversation in which they surmised that she's actually doing a lot better now and sort of guessed that her movement might be neurological, the result of a stroke, and maybe permanent. The topic of quality of life and the Decision were brought up which was kind of out of the blue (as again she's otherwise perfectly fine), I was given a further course of Baytril and Emeraid, semi-advised on how to proceed and sort of sent packing a bit.
I have a few specific concerns but most critically I'm just wondering if anything they told me today sounds reasonable. A stroke and permanent neurological damage definitely weren't on my radar for possible ailments, and being left with a vague notion that her movement might not recover is kind of unexpected given that until today I had the impression it would/could. After questioning I gather that from here, in judging her health I should effectively not factor the movement. I'm also not quite sure what they based their "she's doing better" judgement on - it might entirely be on that she's gained some weight over the course of Emeraid (560 -> 620 grams).
I think what's worrying me is that it's a lot of unexpected information which maybe feels a little like guesswork. Coming away with not much in the way of certainty and yet another course of the same meds just feels a little...odd?
So yeah, bit of an odd situation. Does it seem reasonable, or is it worthwhile at this stage to question what I've been told and get a second opinion? My reaction might just be my own discomfort with what is at the end of the day bad news, but something definitely feels wrong-ish with where I (and my dragon of course) have been left.
Would much appreciate any perspectives on any of the above.